Concerns raised about Tranquille development

You may have heard about a new development proposal for the Tranquille area, on the western edge of the City boundary. The development is on the north side of the Thompson River where it has its outlet with Kamloops Lake. The property straddles the mouth of Tranquille River. The proponent’s website is here.

You can see from the master plan sketch (above) that a significant new housing development of 1,500 units has been planned. This development footprint covers about 51 ha of land, some of which is ‘redeveloping’ the old Tranquille sanitorium footprint, but also involves a significant conversion of farmland into housing.

Current footprint of buildings at Tranquille

A number of groups such as the Kamloops Food Policy Council, Kamloops Naturalist Club, and Grasslands Conservation Council have written letters of concern to the Agricultural Land Commission. So can you! See the instructions below on how to send in your comments as well as the list of concerns that have been raised about this project by various community members.  

Send your letter as an attachment in an e-mail to using the subject “Application ID 60509 submission”. The physical address to be used in the letter itself is:
Agricultural Land Commission
201 – 4940 Canada Way
Burnaby, BC, Canada
V5G 4K6

On February 21, 2021, a conference call was attended by a diverse mix of community members and organizations, including Transition Kamloops. Below is the list of concerns about the proposal that was raised during the meeting, grouped by topic. While individuals and groups highlighted various different potential areas of impact during the meeting, they share the belief that the project, as proposed, would detract from the social, ecological, historical, and agricultural values of the area, while failing to properly address and understand the issue of indigenous title and rights.

  1. General Concerns
    • Most of the info out there is from the developer. There is a need to develop an independent narrative.
    • We need to move quickly, prior to major money being put into consultation by the developer. Each permit secured is a building block for the developer.
    • The water application (to use groundwater for the development) provides the first opportunity to object to the development. Without water, the project stops.
  2. Natural Area issues
    • Tranquille Creek is salmon-bearing and requires a high level of protection. Placer mining and the irrigation dam installed to water orchards has already negatively impacted the salmon population.
    • The proposal will cause a serious loss of habitat in an area of huge ecological importance to wildlife (birds and snakes). Farming is more accommodating to indigenous species than single-family homes.
    • Increased traffic will increase human / wildlife accidents.
    • There is no Environmental Impact Assessment required for the area, despite high values and park adjacency
  3. Archeology
    • The heritage value of the area is unique on a global scale. Secwepemc people have continuously occupied the area from 7500 years ago, and likely back to end of the last Ice Age, and into the contact period. Unusual for a site of this importance, the archeological record is relatively intact.
    • When the first iteration of this proposal came up in the early 2000s, they were obliged to do an Archeological Impact Assessment, and a very cursory one was done.
    • Historical activities include hunting, fishing, plant-gathering and processing, and also births, deaths, and burial ceremonies.
    • This was one of Kamloops’ major urban centres, with population in the thousands.
    • The development as proposed is absolutely incompatible with heritage protection and indigenous rights.
    • Archeological permitting and heritage permitting will be required.
  4. Agriculture
    • The removal of an additional 51 hectares from the Agricultural Land Reserve is being requested, to make way for 3000 people.
    • The agricultural potential of the site is massive, with the top two classes of agricultural-rated lands (70% Class 1, and 30% Class 2). With only 5% of BC suitable for agriculture, and only 1% of that land being class 1 & 2 soils, the ALC has a critical role in protecting BC’s agricultural land resources.
    • Vineyards do not contribute to food security.
    • When this land was sold, the current footprint was seen as the development potential. Now, the need for reclamation and the high cost of taking down buildings is being used as a reason to get more land out of the ALR.
  5. Grasslands
    • The Grasslands Conservation Council has written to the Agricultural Land Commission with their concerns.
  6. First Nations
    • It is important to acknowledge that the development is on unceded Secwepemc territory.
    • The ability to exercise aboriginal hunting and fishing rights in the area is paramount
    • The Province, individual Ministries and the City have new obligations under UNDRIP, through the Declaration Act. The developer believes they only need to satisfy 2010 requirements and is completely ignorant of the larger implications
    • The developer is using the conversations/consultations with SSN as a selling point to further the development, even though the SSN is not in favour of the proposal.
    • The developer is offering First Nations minor consideration, and asking that the pace of development not be slowed.
  7. Community
    • Public access to beaches needs protection.
    • The carbon footprint of the proposal and the obvious sprawl is in direct conflict with the goals of the Official Community Plan.
    • Traffic will increase to service residents, and no transit will be available.
    • The type of development itself, an isolated pod of suburban development, is outdated and unsustainable .
  8. Future consideration
    • Development on the site should never expand beyond the current footprint of what is actively being used for food production. The City of Kamloops should go up, not out.
    • The entire Tranquille area could be designated a heritage conservation area, especially where archaeological remains have been found (village sites), and along the Tranquille River (the riparian corridor), as well as along the route of the Hudson’s Bay Company brigade trail in the gully along the Tranquille-Criss Creek Road. (This trail is pre-1846 so is protected under the Provincial Heritage Conservation Act, although it has not been accurately located).
    • There is potential for purchase by the Province for park designation or First Nations reconciliation.

A new vision supported by the Stk’emlupsemc te Secwepemc Nation and the larger community of Kamloops is required. Urban agriculture, tourism, wilderness and wetland conservation, and a cultural heritage site have been mentioned — all of which could be accommodated without increasing the current development footprint. It’s time for us to think beyond traditional stereotypes of land development before this precious piece of property is irrevocably changed.

Update: The developer, Ignition Tranquille Developments Inc., has responded to the concerns listed on this page via a blog post.

7 thoughts on “Concerns raised about Tranquille development

  1. Proposed housing development in Tranquille farm land will negatively impact this fragile grassland ecosystem, destroy wildlife habitat, and reduce access to this very popular walking and hiking area.

  2. 3e “This was one of Kamloops’ major urban centres, with population in the thousands.”
    3f “The development as proposed is absolutely incompatible with heritage protection and indigenous rights.”
    These 2 items make it appear that it is returning to its original use/purpose. Hmmm…

  3. One of the main goals of this development is a large agricultural component. This is not realistic for the reason that 90 % of the top soil has blown away over the last 20 years. I became aware of this when ,about ten years ago the heavy horse club was interested in making the area thier new home. The barns were built the land appeared ready to be tilled for crops. One of their yearly programs involved a ploughing match that brought other heavy horse ploughing teams to the area to compete. This match had been successfully held in Knutsford for many years but they and the match needed a new home. With many ranchers on site they were looking forward to ploughing almost virgin ground. To bad . When they tried to get their ploughs into the ground they found that there was very little top soil. It was so thin that they said that NO crop could be planted or seeded. Not even Hay. This (if proven) makes the plans for this area largley fictitious.

  4. This is such a beautiful piece of land, which was utilized by people for many years. It is falling apart. The history of this land needs to be preserved…but let’s is history!

    It is time to once again care for it which will cost tons of money, and who ever cleans it up will need to recoup some of the cost somehow, how?

    Let’s put our heads together and figure it out!! Instead of saying no to every proposal that comes our way!!

  5. I’m indigenous and frankly I don’t give a crap about that argument. Myself and grandparents were born and raised here . My greatest concern is the constant destruction of this city’s heritage by outsiders who dont give a crap. All I see is more housing for Vancouvers elite and destruction of crucial wildlife habitat. I don’t believe for one second that this development will be for everyone. Another snob hill .. It will be the Canadian version of Martha’s Vineyard . This area should have been preserved , restored to its historical beauty and opened to the public. This developer should be fined for allowing these beautiful historical buildings to fall into ruin..

  6. What will be done to improve and widen the road from Ord Road or the airport to accommodate the increased traffic from 300 residents.
    There is a band of California Bighorn that use the area. Clearly they will be impacted, not only from the development but the population increase that will roam the hills.

  7. The area of the propised construction project is a historically native Secwepemc area, an area of great significance for various wildlife, including endangered species and protected species, and a valuable narural area, which many people enjoy without permanently erecting dwellings thete.
    It is the home of Bighorn sheep, rattle snakes, bears, beavers, cougars, agreat variety of birds, endangered salmon, and many more species big and small. This area needs to be preserved as a natural area.
    There could be some housing, as it is already today high up away from the water and surrounding areas. There should not even be farming too close to the water and surrounding areas to not pollute the water and damage the natural environment, and to not impact natural animal and plant populations.
    There is no infrastructure to support this huge proposed settlement.
    I do not understand, how our fisheries and oceans department could approve this project.
    I also do not understand, why the agricultural land commission would allow conversion of valuable ranch lands and natural areas into satellite towns . The current buildings of Tranquille are not adjacent to the rivers and lakes. There should never be development close to the river and lake as this area needs protection.
    This project would not provide housing for those in need, would not provide locally grown affordable food for those in need, would endanger wildlife and the environment, would not provide a natural recreation and nature area for local residents, would cost locals in terms of having to provide services, like road nuilding and maintenance, hospital services, sewer and water and garbage services, and so much more.
    I am opposed to this development for all of these and more reasons.
    And I am appalled, that the wildlife, that is calling this place home, has not even been condidered.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *